 |
WINDOW INTO THE FUTURE: This
’97 Corvette doesn't have a steering column,
and it knows how to stay on course.
|
imagine you're driving
home at night after a grueling day at work. You’re
tired and preoccupied; you don’t notice when your
car starts to drift out of the lane and into oncoming
traffic. But fortunately, an onboard computer senses
the vehicle leaving the lane and automatically pulls
it back.
This “lane-keeping assistant” is the brainchild
of Chris Gerdes, an assistant professor of mechanical
engineering. It’s one of several projects under
way at the Dynamic Design Lab on campus, where Gerdes
and a cadre of graduate students tinker with the next
generation of computerized cars, creating vehicles that
will be safer and more fun to drive.
More than 40,000 people are killed in motor vehicle
accidents each year in the United States. One-third
of those fatal crashes are caused by a car drifting
out of its lane—often because the driver is drowsy
or distracted—and colliding with a stationary
object. “A driver assistance system whose sole
purpose is to keep the vehicle in the lane could go
a long way toward reducing that number,” Gerdes
says.
As a first step, Gerdes’s crew ripped the steering
column out of a 1997 Corvette and replaced it with computer-driven
motors to turn the wheels. They added GPS navigation
and sophisticated algorithms, and the first-of-its-kind
lane-keeping assistant was born.
LOOK, MA, NO HANDS!
On the roof of a parking structure near the Medical
Center—the Dynamic Design Lab’s campus proving
ground—orange traffic cones mark a more-or-less
circular course. I am to drive (or be driven, as the
case may be) as Gerdes and grad student Josh Switkes
put the Corvette through its paces.
I strap myself in, grab hold of the steering wheel with
both hands, and ease my foot down on the gas. Gerdes
tells me the ’Vette will do highway speeds, but
I keep it under 10 mph, just to be safe. At first, it
feels no different than driving a regular car; then,
as I turn wide around a bend, I can feel the slight
tug on the steering wheel. On a straight, flat road,
it would be less obvious, Gerdes says.
After a lap or two, I take my hands off the wheel, and
something remarkable happens: the car advances toward
the cones, then angles left and follows the curving
path all on its own. I think: I could get used to this.
Switkes compares the lane-keeping assistant to a spring
that connects the car to the lane’s center. When
the car begins to drift out of the lane, it’s
as if the spring is being pulled. In fact, as the car
drifts, the steering system signals the computer controlling
the wheels, which then gently nudges the car back toward
the center.
Gerdes is quick to point out that the lane-keeping assistant
“is not HAL behind the wheel.” It doesn’t
make any judgments about how good—or bad—a
driver you are; if you steer firmly, the car will obey.
The lane-keeping assistant will “let you steer
right off a cliff if that’s what you choose to
do,” he says. The idea is not to take control
away from the driver, but to lend an almost imperceptible
hand. “Chris likes to say that there should only
be one intelligence in the car,” Switkes says.
HOT WIRING
The key to assistive technologies like the lane-keeping
system is “steer-by-wire.” By-wire means
driver commands are conveyed electronically, not through
mechanical means such as a steering shaft. And its implementation
has already begun.
If you’re driving a newer car, chances are the
gas pedal isn’t connected to anything but silicon.
Most cars built since the late 1990s use throttle-by-wire,
which means that when you put the pedal to the metal
all it’s really doing is signaling a computer
to direct fuel to the engine. Brake-by-wire is starting
to show up in a few models, including the Mercedes-Benz
E class.
One advantage of by-wire is the ability to combine information
from different systems for more coordinated control.
In the case of the lane-keeping assistant, the computer
integrates inputs from the steering wheel with differential
GPS (DGPS) coordinates received via three roof antennas.
Using a high-resolution digital map of the road, it
can discern the lane boundaries.
By-wire also makes cars more fuel efficient and lowers
emissions. Moreover, it opens up a new world of design
possibilities. Eliminating the bulky gear under the
hood allows for more leg room, larger front windows
and a steering wheel that slides easily from the left
to the right side of the car. For that matter, who needs
a steering wheel? You could steer by joystick or airplane-style
U-shaped controller. You could brake with a button or
accelerate with a lever.
Of course, consumers may not be ready to give up mechanical
control of steering, let alone the wheel itself (a “pretty
ingenious device,” as Gerdes puts it). “Already
we’re separated from the throttle, and we’re
kind of separated from the brakes, but people are attached
to the steering solidly,” he says. “I think
it’s going to be a difficult thing for people
to accept at first—the idea that they no longer
have the rigid mechanical connection that they trust.”
They will have some time to get used to it. The power-hungry
electric motors and other devices of a completely by-wire
car “will use more electric power than is available”
through today’s 12-volt electrical systems, wrote
industry analyst Joe Constance of Technical Insights
in a July 2004 report covering trends in automotive
electronics. “They may have to wait for 42-volt
electric systems before they see widespread installation.”
That may not be for another 10 to 15 years.
Those craving a lane-keeping assistant will also have
to wait for the nation’s small DGPS network to
expand to cover the 4 million miles of road criss-crossing
the country. The GPS navigation systems in today’s
cars can’t always detect what lane you’re
in, let alone when you leave it. DGPS is a more accurate
system with built-in error correction. Still, the technology
is not infallible, since tall buildings can deflect
signals. Gerdes points out that “the lane-keeping
assistant need not work everywhere to be effective”;
most accidents occur on open roads, often rural highways,
where DGPS works well. “In any commercial system,
you would want to merge the GPS sensing with cameras
to have a more robust lane-sensing system,” he
adds.
What Gerdes aims to show is that a by-wire car can be
safer than a conventional one. “We don’t
want to stop with making it as good, we want it to be
improved,” he says. “And with electronics
and sensors, there’s definitely a lot of capability
to do that.”
His group is testing some safety enhancements on the
P1, an all-electric by-wire prototype that looks like
an overgrown RC dune buggy. Left and right wheels are
controlled independently, as is rear-wheel drive, allowing
the researchers to experiment with steering-system redundancy.
Another unique solution they’ve come up with involves
turning both rear wheels in and snowplowing to a stop.
If all else fails, the P1 is equipped with a giant red
“power kill switch” that Gerdes says is
exactly what it looks like: a panic button.
Although he did his PhD work in the field of highway
automation, Gerdes stops short of trying to develop
cars that drive themselves. As powerful as today’s
computers are, he explains, they simply can’t
take everything into account, whereas people are actually
extremely good at reacting quickly to changing conditions.
“It’s a very rapidly changing picture out
on the highway,” Gerdes says. “I think it’s
more realistic to work on the things that people don’t
do well, give them some assistance with that, and let
people do the things they do well.”
Besides, he says, “it would bug a lot of people
in this lab if we took away driving entirely because
a lot of people here really enjoy driving.”
CARS JUST WANNA HAVE FUN
Indeed, experimenting with by-wire technology isn’t
just about making cars safer; it’s about making
them snazzier. The lane-keeping assistant is installed
on a Corvette, after all.
 |
DRIVE SAFELY: Gerdes's prototype
vehicle can compensate for failures in steering
and braking.
|
“Used to be people would work on their car—pop
the hood, tinker with the engine, change the suspension—people
don’t tend to do that anymore. But what if we
could use by-wire technologies to make it all programmable?”
Gerdes says. “These are applications that could
really drive the technology from the fun perspective.”
To that end, graduate student Judy Hsu is working on
a simulation that might one day make it possible for
anyone to feel like Jeff Gordon behind the wheel. “What’s
cool about race car drivers is that they’re used
to driving at the limits of handling all the time, so
they’re very sensitive to the tire forces that
are fed back through the steering wheel,” she
says.
But when your average NASCAR dad feels the tires begin
to slip, he tends to panic and brake too hard, which
can send the car into a skid. Hsu says a vehicle outfitted
with GPS and tire sensors could sense when the car is
pushing the limit and automatically compensate, without
the driver even realizing it.
Even with a smart stability system, Hsu says, you won’t
be able to “drive crazy and be fine.” Real
race cars, she points out, are high-performance vehicles.
But she admits that part of the motivation for the research
is lab members’ Daytona dreams.
By-wire control could usher in a whole new age of automotive
customization. Handling characteristics like the steering
ratio—how much you have to crank the wheel in
order to turn the tires—could be tailored for
every member of the family. Gerdes sees a future of
people tweaking their cars and swapping the specs over
the Internet, just like video gamers do now.
Sign me up for the SUV that
drives like a sports car.
|