 |
Glenn Matsumura
|
This year’s Commencement speaker was Steve Jobs,
a legendary pioneer in high technology, celebrated by
computer users and music lovers for his bold vision and
willingness to take risks. I thought Steve was an appropriate
choice in a year when we also mark the 100th anniversary
of the death of one of Stanford’s first pioneers
and visionaries, Jane Stanford.
Jane and Leland Stanford were married in 1850 and
moved from New York to Wisconsin, where Leland set up
a law practice. When a fire in Leland’s office
destroyed everything, he despaired.
It was Jane, according to legend, who responded: “We
will go to California!” Together they built a busy
and prosperous life that included a term in the governor’s
mansion and building the nation’s first transcontinental
railroad.
Jane’s willingness to take a risk and try something
different was an early indication of her
spirit and drive. As biographers writing about Mrs.
Stanford’s “iron will” have observed,
she seemed at her best in the face of adversity. When
the Stanfords lost their only child, Leland Jr., they
grieved deeply. But they did not become bitter or turn
inward. Rather, they devoted much of their wealth to
establish the University as a memorial to their son.
The Stanfords believed that, despite their grief, they
had much to be thankful for and that it was their duty
to share these gifts.
Nearly 500 students, men and women, attended the
University’s opening day ceremonies in 1891.
Senator Stanford asked his wife to address them. She
agreed, but when the time came, she was overcome by the
emotion of the day. Six years later, she sent President
David Starr Jordan a copy of the remarks she was unable
to read.
“Our hearts have been more deeply interested in
this work than you can conceive,” she wrote. “It
was born in sorrow but has now become a great joy.
. . . I desire to impress upon the minds of each
one . . .
the hope that you will each strive to place before
yourselves a high moral standard; that you will
resolve to go forth from these classrooms determined
in the future to be leaders with high aims and
standards; and live such lives that it will be
said of you that you are true to the best you know.
. . .”
Less than two years after the opening day ceremonies,
Senator Stanford died in his sleep and Jane was left
to shoulder the financial burden of the new University
on her own. No one expected it to remain open. But Jane
Stanford was a strong-willed woman. After two weeks of
reflection, she declared that Stanford University would
not close its doors.
She took control. University expenses and salaries
were cut. After the probate court set aside an allowance
for her, she slashed her own expenses, released most
of her personal staff and took only a small amount for
her needs; the rest she channeled to the University.
Then she learned that the federal government was suing
the estate for loans made to the Central Pacific Railroad.
The Supreme Court eventually rejected the government’s
claims, and in 1898, the estate was released from probate.
By sheer force of will, Mrs. Stanford had guided the
University through lean and difficult years, ensuring
that it would endure for generations to come.
In 1904, a year before her death, she told the
University’s trustees:
“Through all these years I have kept a mental picture
before me. I could see a hundred years ahead when all
the present trials were forgotten, and all of the present
active parties gone, and nothing remaining but the institution.
I could see beyond all this the children’s children’s
children coming here from the East, the West, the North
and the South.” These are my favorite words of
Jane’s. They express the University’s commitment
to the future and to the education of our youth.
It is now “a hundred years ahead” and we
are the inheritors of that legacy—one of great
personal vision and fierce tenacity, of dedication and
service to the highest purposes. We must carry the torch
forward, so that the spirit Jane Stanford so boldly embodied
will continue to inspire future generations. We must
have a vision and an ambition for Stanford that is as
compelling and as forward looking as that mental picture
Jane envisioned more than 100 years ago.
|