|
|
|
|
 |
Send
us a letter |
|
|
|
In Praise of Western Civ
In 1946-47, I took the required three-quarter Western
Civ course (“What
Freshmen Need to Know,” March/April). It contained
several facts and did not encourage us to “think
on a fuzzie [sic] track.” No other intellectual
experience has approached it for the deep and enduring
value it has had in my life.
Moreover, no attempt was made to “integrate”
the study of history with other humanities subjects
I took. Having been blessed with a three-digit IQ, I
was able to perform whatever integratory tasks were
called for on my own. I am grateful that such respect
was shown for my intelligence and that of my classmates,
and wonder why today’s faculty feel they have
to chew our food for us instead of just putting it on
the table.
John W. Bush, ’50
Brooklyn, New York
Am I the only person left who says universities are
the leading bastions of socialistic thought, and who
warns young Christians who go to college, “Don’t
let them ruin your faith”? Is the Stanford freshman
curriculum in that category? It almost seems “classical
education” is an outmoded idea. What a loss, and
what a pity!
Jo Jean DeCristoforo, ’45
Sacramento, California

|
|
Coed Misadventures
Parents of undergraduates must have been shocked to
read that their male and female offspring are taking
showers naked together in the Chi Theta Chi house (“The
Far Side of the Farm,” March/April). Pictures
were taken of this rite of immorality and later proudly
displayed at the entrance to the coed co-op. All of
this nonsense was approved by the house social manager
and by this magazine, whose editorial standards of decency
and morality have sunk to a new nadir. The University
administration is apparently asleep to these misadventures.
Eugene Danaher, PhD ’46
Tallahassee, Florida

|
|
Wearing the Uniform
Roman Skaskiw’s article was refreshing (E-mail
from Iraq, March/April). My experience with Stanford
students was significantly different. As a USMC officer,
my homecoming flight from Vietnam in March 1970 was
diverted from Travis Air Force Base to a base outside
of L.A. to avoid the antiwar rants of “baby-killer”
that were being delivered from protesters, mainly from
the nearby campuses of Berkeley and Stanford.
How ironic that 31 years later, my son, a New Yorker
like Mr. Skaskiw, would also graduate from Stanford.
Obviously, my feelings for Stanford have mellowed. I
enjoy your magazine as a Stanford parent.
Daniel P. Donovan
Lido Beach, New York
In your March/April issue, you carry an eloquent article
by an Army captain. You title it “What Are We
Doing Here?” although Capt. Roman Skaskiw, ‘01,
is quite clear what he is able to do for and with his
Iraqi friends and expresses “great satisfaction”
in doing it.
But editor Kevin Cool (First
Impressions) is unwilling to let the captain’s
story speak for itself. His bouquet to Capt. Skaskiw
calls up memories of a motion picture in which American
soldiers, in “the charred, mangled remnants of
a Vietnamese city,” sing the Mickey Mouse Club
song. This reminds Mr. Cool of “the ambivalence
so many people feel about America,” and leads
him to categorize three attitudes about American soldiery,
only one of which is to find them both admirable and
useful, but one of which is to “so abhor the notion
of sanctioned killing they can’t stomach the uniform.”
I don’t know how representative Mr. Cool is of
the Stanford family. Washington’s soldiers wore
that uniform and created the country that nurtures him.
Lincoln’s soldiers wore it, preserving the Union
and ending slavery. Sixty and more years ago, I and
millions of young Americans wore it and turned back
a murderous tyrant who would have plunged the world
into the dark ages and destroyed everything universities
like Stanford stand for. Only a few years ago, the country
whose soldiers wore that uniform was the only country
both willing and able to stop genocide in the Balkans.
Opinions differ sharply about the goals and prospects
for success of the current war, but should lead no American
citizen to be so blind to courage and sacrifice as to
find that “they can’t stomach the uniform.”
I am reminded of these lines by the poet Edgar Lee Masters:
What is this I hear of sorrow and weariness,
Anger, discontent and drooping hopes?
Degenerate sons and daughters,
Life is too strong for you—
It takes life to love Life.
Richard W. Jencks, ’46, JD ’48
Mill Valley, California
As a military service member, I wanted to thank you
for taking the time to focus on alumni in the military.
Just to let you know, there are more than 130 active-duty
officers who have graduated from Stanford (undergraduate
and graduate) in the Army today.
Mike Siegl, ’95
Washington, D.C.

|
|
The President’s Words
The creation of the Stanford Institute for the Environment
is great news. I wish it had existed during my time
at the Farm (President’s
Column, March/April). I was disappointed in the
lack of urgency in President Hennessy’s statement,
“This is the century when we must learn how to
live in an environmentally sustainable way.” Do
we really have 100 years to figure this out? Perhaps.
But our planet will be a very different, less hospitable
home if we don’t act more quickly.
Ted Tuescher, ‘84
Mill Valley, California
I am bewildered that the magazine let an egregious
misuse of the word enormity slip through. The word refers
to abomination, horribleness, and has nothing to do
with size or volume.
Ted Bache
Menlo Park, California
Even if our leadership were not focused on fighting
mortality by disease and malnutrition, future prospects
for the biological world and for the human population
would be grim. A focus on providing clean water rather
than the means of reproductive limitation is irresponsible
and immoral.
Raymond R. White, PhD ’73
Palo Alto, California

|
|
Wallace No Communist
Are we supposed to believe that Henry Wallace, FDR’s
vice president from 1941 to 1945, was a Communist (“For
the Record,” Showcase, March/April)? It’s
true that when Wallace ran for president in 1948 as
the candidate of the Progressive Party, he was endorsed
by the Communist Party, along with other groups. For
those who believe in guilt by association, I suppose
this indicates Wallace was a Communist.
The truth is that Wallace was a homegrown American
idealist who fervently supported FDR and continued to
pursue the goals of the New Deal after Roosevelt’s
death. The issue is not whether his ideas were right
or wrong. The issue is whether they should be dismissed
by slapping an inaccurate and pejorative label on them.
As a graduate student, I used the Hoover Institution’s
library and archives, which are among Stanford’s
greatest assets. I hope the recordings in the Commonwealth
Club collection will be accurately labeled.
Emily H. Schwartz, MA ’64, PhD ’73
Austin, Texas
| Editor's Note: We
regret the inaccuracy, which was ours alone. |

|
|
Minna’s Memories
An item in “Century
at Stanford” (March/April) brought back memories
of the wonderful landlady of my graduate student days.
Minna Stillman, daughter of the first chair of the chemistry
department and, in her own right, first head of the
Stanford Libraries documents division, was in her mid-80s
when I knew her. She was still working in the library
and bringing her fierce intelligence to bear on economic
and political issues in a women’s seminar on campus.
On the day that John F. Kennedy was shot, she reassured
me about the state of the union by telling me she remembered
that when “Mr. McKinley” was shot, the federal
bureaucracy kept going pretty much on its own.
She had arrived at Stanford as a 12-year-old girl just
as the first buildings were being built and had lived
in the same faculty house ever since. She remembered
the Stanfords, David Starr Jordan, the Hoovers and that
most long-winded of dinner guests, William James. She
was home alone the night of the 1906 earthquake because
her parents had gone to the opera in San Francisco and
spent the night there.
Minna’s account of the tragic events of the 1903
Iroquois Theatre fire in Chicago, in which she lost
her twin sister, differed slightly from yours. Minna
had stayed home that evening and so was not at the theater
when her sister died. Remembering Minna’s devotion
to accuracy in things large and small, I thought she
would want us to get the story straight in this historical
column.
Camille Hanlon, PhD ’64
Waterford, Connecticut

|
|
Big One Missing
“Planet
Cardinal” (Red All Over, March/April) highlighted
the involvement of Stanford alums in Oscar-nominated
films, but missed a big one: Rick Porras, ‘88,
was an assistant producer of some kind on the Lord
of the Rings trilogy.
Thanks for your great work. I always enjoy the magazine.
I especially enjoy Rod Searcey’s excellent photographs.
Chris Myers, ’88
Portland, Oregon
| Editor's Note: Porras
was co-producer of the award-winning trilogy. |

|
|
Investigating Jesus
In response to Elaine Pagels (“The
Gospel Truth,” January/February), I am grieved
that her pain at the loss of her friend was not addressed
as a young teen. She might have been spared years of
confusion. The truth is that Christianity exemplifies
compassion; the life and death of Jesus Christ illustrate
the truest meaning of selfless love.
To “identify oneself as Christian,” as
Ms. Pagels has done, yet to miss the uniqueness of Jesus
is to misunderstand the Christian faith. He claimed:
“I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no
one comes to the Father, but through Me.” (John
14:6) As has been written, Jesus was either truly the
Son of God, as he claimed, or he was a liar or a lunatic!
Ms. Pagels presents a different faith than the historic
faith of Christ’s followers for the past 2,000
years. Her ideas about additional, extrabiblical gospel
writings have been refuted many times over the years.
What has remained as the gospel truth is this: Jesus
Christ is the unique Son of God who fully revealed God
to the race he created and who offered himself as the
only means by which that sinful race can be reconciled
to God.
I urge readers to investigate the claims of Jesus Christ
for themselves. They may wish to begin with Lee Strobel’s
helpful book, The Case for Christ.
Winnifred Coe Verbica, ’56
San Jose, California
|
|
Back in the Saddle
I so enjoyed the article, “Still
Riding High” about Juliette Suhr (Class Notes
Spotlight, March/April). She is not only the grande
dame of endurance riding, but also a grand lady in every
respect. I was disappointed there was not more detailed
information as to how to get her book. I did find out:
contact Marinera Publishing, 100 Marinera Road, Scotts
Valley, CA 95066 or www.endurance.net/juliesuhr;
phone (831) 335-5948; fax (831) 335-5933; $24.95 (+
$5 shipping). I am sure many would like to read Ten
Feet Tall, Still.
Annette Gattuccio Bianco, ’46
Phoenix, Arizona

|
|
A Grandfather’s Dream
My son, John, is now a sophomore at Stanford. Both
his father and I were first-generation college students
(“Family
Firsts,” January/February). My grandfather
(Pap-Pap) worked in the steel mills in Uniontown, Pa.
The mining company built small row houses where many
families lived. The small community was generally depressing;
it was a great place to be from.
Pap-Pap only had a sixth-grade education, but he strongly
encouraged all of us to go to college. He resented the
fact that he was pulled out of school to start working
in the coal mines, as were four other brothers and sisters,
so that his youngest brother could finish high school.
He applauded U.S. technical achievements and would
tell me, when I was little, that we’d put a man
on the moon before I turned 35. Actually, it happened
when I was 10, and he was still alive to see it. When
I was pregnant with John, it was Pap-Pap who told me
he had a dream and knew that I would have a little boy
and raise him very successfully.
Who would have guessed that in three generations, the
family would go from the coal mines of Pennsylvania
to the idyllic academic biosphere known as Stanford?
Thanks for reminding me of this.
Sue Garrod
Kailua-Kona, Hawaii
|
|
Breathing Difficulty
It sounds as if the “Magicians” of Palo
Alto (Being
There, January/February) honestly believe that breathing
is “really a choice” rather than a need.
It should not be surprising, then, that they might debate
whether another person should be allowed that choice
in the first place. I only hope that the two beautiful
girls being raised by “all these different adults”
never learn that their very caretakers at one point
questioned whether they should be born at all.
Shanti Dickson, ’96
Santa Clara, California
How grateful one (or both) of Robin Bayer’s twin
girls must be to the Magic group to have been given
the “choice” to breathe.
Beth Webster, ’77
Annecy, France

|
|
Hope for Grad Students
I was pleased to read about the soon-to-be-opened Graduate Student Center (“Rooms
of Their Own,” Farm Report, January/February),
having spent a year on the Farm in 1981-82 pursuing
a master’s degree. In addition to having no central
place to meet, graduate students were not a very homogeneous
group—married and single, with and without children,
living on campus and off. Some were perhaps already
“beaten up” a bit by the real world, others
still a little wet behind the ears.
To the undergrads, we were a motley group of older
and likely poorer folks, being so overly focused on
our studies and research, who long ago had lost all
sense of how to have fun. Those of us who had non-Stanford
undergraduate degrees were viewed as not fully “Cardinal
red.”
Nonetheless, many of us still bought the Stanford T-shirts
and sweatshirts and went to all the football games.
We could take heart that many of us were light years
ahead of the undergrads in maturity—this I would
say to myself, just before some undergrad’s BMW
cut off my repair-prone MGB late at night when, after
a long evening of study, I was heading home to an inviting
plate of macaroni at my tiny Menlo Park apartment.
Eventually, I did find one place—Breakers Eating
Club. I learned to stomach the occasional ill-prepared
meals by that unique cooking team of political science/electrical
engineering/MBA grad students, for Breakers allowed
me to meet fellow graduate students from around the
world.
Maybe this new Graduate Student Center will lead to
a much greater unification of grad students, and hopefully
better meals—and maybe it will allow grad students
to reclaim that sense of how to have fun.
Donald A. Bentley, MS ’82
La Puente, California

|
|
Syria Revisited
Your January/February Showcase has an excerpt
from Scott Davis’s The Road From Damascus,
a book I enjoyed. But why choose the anecdote “My
Afternoon Tea with the Secret Police”? As the
editor correctly states, in his book Davis “puts
a human face on Syria.” However, the only Syrians
in your selection were secret police and would-be policemen.
It’s too bad, because most Syrians in the book
are friendly and hospitable. You neglect to mention
that Davis was worried because he was a journalist traveling
improperly on a tourist visa, and that the incident
he describes is not typical of Syria today. Davis writes
early in the book that when he revisited Syria in 2001
he found things “relaxed,” he was “completely
unafraid,” and the police were polite.
It is revealing that your editor describes Syria as
an “enigmatic country” and finds it “surprising”
that Syrians generally feel affection for Americans.
Perhaps the editor holds a stereotype that is inaccurate.
Like Davis, I have visited and enjoyed Syria, and I
recommend The Road from Damascus. In it your
readers will find the human face of Syria that didn’t
make it into STANFORD.
Laurence “Larry” Michalak, ’64
Oakland, California

|
|
More Lore
It was a nice trip back to read about bear tracks on
Hoover Tower, Doodles Weaver, etc. (“Getting
the Axe,” Letters, March/April). But how could
[Ralph Whittaker, ’49] overlook Warren G. Wonka,
who appeared so often in the Quad, or George
Tirebiter or the Little Profs (were there six of them?)
with their briefcases and hats all marching in a row?
Hobert W. (Bert) Burns, ’50, EdD ’57
San Jose, California

|
|
Too Small
Thank you for sending STANFORD.
I am really interested in what President Hennessy has
to say, and in general the headlines and table of contents
entice me to read it, but the small print of the articles
discourages me (the advertisements have big enough print).
I understand that it may be a difficult decision to
leave things out that interest people, but I am surely
not the only one who does not like the small font size.
Maria Decker
Menlo Park, California

|
 |
| Address letters to:
Letters to the Editor
STANFORD magazine
Arrillaga Alumni Center
326 Galvez Street
Stanford, CA 94305-6105
Or fax to (650) 725-8676; or send us an e-mail. You
may also submit your letter online.
Letters may be edited for length, clarity and civility.
|
|
RETURN
TO TOP
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|