 |
NATURAL TALENT: Thornburgh’s
music evokes outdoor delights.
Rod Searcey |
drivers passing the plain
silver van traveling from Berkeley to Stanford last
July 17 would never have guessed its cargo. Later that
hot summer evening, in the cool intimacy of the Cantor
Arts Center auditorium, it was unveiled: Stanford’s
newest musical instrument, looking like a grand piano’s
slimmer cousin. Over the previous year, John Phillips
had drawn on more than three decades of experience to
build the 8 1/2-foot-long harpsichord, and he delivered
it personally from his workshop to its debut performance.
Stanford early music lecturer and harpsichordist Elaine
Thornburgh was at the keyboard with a program that complemented
the season’s art exhibition, “The Changing
Garden.” Selections from composers Rameau, Byrd,
Couperin, Sweelinck and Peerson conveyed luxuriant sound
portraits of poppies and primroses, woods and ocean
waves, butterflies and nightingales.
Thornburgh sees nature not as an abstraction, but a
vital element in daily life. Introducing Sweelinck’s
“Under the Linden Tree,” she cited recent
magazine articles about the demise of romance in marriages.
Ardor might stand a chance, she mused, if people spent
more time gamboling in the voluptuous outdoors instead
of parked behind flickering computer screens. Similarly,
Thornburgh said, radio, television and the habit of
passive entertainment have diminished musical performance
as a cornerstone of merrymaking and socializing.
As it happens, the harpsichord is ideally suited to
the acoustics of a parlor, rather than a grand concert
hall. The earliest instruments date back to 15th-century
Flanders, and their precursors were handheld. Over the
next 400 years, different designs evolved according
to the needs of the composers they served. Italian design
tends to be simple, focusing on purity and beauty of
tone. Elaborately painted Flemish-style instruments
featured a second manual (keyboard) used to transpose
music. French designs couple the two manuals so that
a single keystroke activates one-, two- or three-string
registers, resulting in the familiar lush quality reminiscent
of a lute or viola da gamba. German harpsichords, more
evocative of an organ, are associated with the music
of J.S. Bach and C.P.E. Bach, while the English school
added features designed to compete with the up-and-coming
piano in the late 18th century.
By 1800, the harpsichord was eclipsed by the piano.
(The biggest difference between them is that harpsichord
strings are plucked, piano strings struck.) The harpsichord
stayed in the shadows more than a hundred years, until
Wanda Landowska’s performances in the early 20th
century—and improved techniques in harpsichord
building—sparked a revival.
 |
MANUAL LABOR: It took a year
to build.
Rod Searcey |
At Stanford, a jury of keyboard instructors chooses
four to six intermediate and advanced music students
each year to study with Thornburgh, the department’s
sole harpsichordist. Until the recent acquisition, the
University’s inventory of early keyboard instruments
included a French and an Italian harpsichord but hadn’t
been updated in nearly 30 years. Thornburgh and Mario
Champagne, the music department’s administrative
director, thought the collection needed a new instrument
for teaching and performing.
Choosing a harpsichord is not undertaken lightly. Apart
from the $30,000-plus price tag, different types of
instruments suit different styles of music. After Champagne
discovered an unused gift to fund the purchase, he and
Thornburgh visited Phillips’s Berkeley workshop
and liked the sound of a Dresden-style harpsichord.
Phillips explains that the 1739 Gräbner upon which
he based his design for Stanford has a French disposition,
making it ideal for Bach’s Goldberg Variations.
It can also accommodate a large repertoire of other
composers, including all but 39 of Scarlatti’s
sonatas, those that require a key one note above the
Gräbner’s five-octave range.
The new instrument is constructed of Ponderosa pine
with a soundboard of Norway spruce, and decorative and
structural elements of claro walnut. Two manuals control
two sets of 8-foot unison strings and one set of 4-foot
strings pitched an octave higher, which can be sounded
individually or together, allowing the colors of the
individual registers to blend in organ-like textures.
Although bird quill plectra are generally acknowledged
to give the best touch for plucking the strings, they
are easily ruined and require more maintenance, so Phillips
used synthetic delrin set in pearwood jacks with holly
tongues.
Phillips says the first time he played the newly built
harpsichord, it sounded as though it was “stuffed
with cotton and strung with rubber bands.” A month
of playing allowed the soundboard to mature and brought
out the resonances that give an instrument its soul.
After the new harpsichord’s Stanford debut, its
maker assesses the sound as powerful and complex, yet
clear enough that all the inner voices can be heard.
The trebles are bright and singing, the basses sonorous.
Adds Champagne, “It looks great, sounds good,
the touch is very nice, the action is whisper-light.
It’s fabulous.”
Music lovers have a chance to judge for themselves,
when Thornburgh gives a solo performance on February
12 at 8 p.m. in Memorial Church. Tickets (general public
$10, students $5) will be sold at the door.
| The following is supplemental
material that did not appear in the print edition
of STANFORD. |
Walking into John Phillips’s Berkeley workshop
is like taking a step back in time. Wood lines the studio,
from raw boards of ponderosa pine and a sheet of burled
walnut to the neatly organized pattern pieces that will
constitute a whole instrument. Strips of wood (called
gobars) under tension resemble a small forest of bare
trees, curving under pressure adjusted daily to bend
them into shape. A French and a Flemish harpsichord
are under construction, awaiting bases that will be
fitted onto the underside of their completed case rims.
(For the Stanford instrument, Phillips fitted the sides
around the base.)
Phillips specializes in restoration work as well as
new construction. He tells of one 17th-century harpsichord
he had to strip down to the case and soundboard, then
splice slivers of wood to fill hundreds of minute cracks.
Only then could his assistant apply paint to match the
original Flemish floral pattern. He points to a nearly
400-year-old base that bears the maker’s original
red pencil markings indicating the location of the 8-foot
bridge.
Any modern craftsman plying an old trade must decide
when modern tools and technology will serve the craft
rather than detract from it. Wanting to stay true to
original styles, Phillips studied their history and
learned from assembling kits and copying old designs,
apprentice-style, before venturing to innovate. He uses
modern tools like a table saw and a band saw for cutting,
and Microsoft Excel to calculate tension curves for
stringing. But all his planing, fitting of joints and
finish work is done by hand. He chooses glues for their
historical authenticity, bonding quality and reversibility.
(Gluing the soundboard into the case is one tricky maneuver,
and reversibility is essential, Phillips says.)
After 30 years in the business, Phillips estimates
that he has about 90 harpsichords in circulation, and
that he can build about four per year. |