Farm Report
|
|
TOP JOBS For Provost, a Logical Choice |
|
ANSWERING THE
CALL: Etchemendy has been a philosophy professor
for 17 years. Glenn
Matsumura Like all Stanford provosts past, Etchemendy, 48, is a longtime professor. He earned his PhD at Stanford in 1982 and returned to the philosophy department in 1983 from Princeton, where he was an assistant professor. The new provost's research interests include logic, semantics and the philosophy of language. In recent years, he's focused on the role diagrams and other nonlinguistic forms play in reasoning.
His popularity extends to faculty and staff, says developmental biology professor Lucy Shapiro, who co-chaired the search committee with Hennessy. "He was nominated by a vast number of people from across the campus -- I never saw anything like it." Nominators cited Etchemendy's sensitivity and effectiveness; one called him the best associate dean in living memory (he served from 1993 to 1997). "John is a coalition builder," she says. "If he says no, you don't hate him." That quality will help in his new post. As the University's top academic and budgetary officer, the provost must be a master of tough choices. But Etchemendy is upbeat. "Stanford is so well positioned in so many ways," he says. The challenge, as he sees it, is to continue the University's "upward trajectory" despite an endowment that's dwarfed by those of other top-ranked schools, town-gown friction over the housing shortage, and the nationwide crisis in funding medical education. Etchemendy lives in Menlo Park with his wife, Nancy, who writes science fiction and horror stories, and their 15-year-old son, Max, who, according to his father, is the only person the logician ever loses an argument to. Etchemendy allows that his new job is "a diversion from my chosen career" but says his experience on the recent presidential search committee -- months of intense conversations about Stanford -- drove home the importance of the work of the president and provost. Answering the call became that much easier. "You build up a weakness," he says. One wonders what Max would say to the logic of that. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||